• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Healthinfluenza

Flu Season Is Here, But How Effective Is the 2018 Flu Shot?

By
Jaclyn Gallucci
Jaclyn Gallucci
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Jaclyn Gallucci
Jaclyn Gallucci
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 29, 2018, 2:30 PM ET

The 2018-2019 flu season has officially arrived, the Food and Drug Administration announced this week. And after last year’s flu killed 80,000 people—the highest U.S. influenza death toll in 40 years—many are questioning how effective the flu shot really is.

The short answer: No one really knows.

The long answer: This year’s flu shot is looking promising—so far.

The effectiveness of the flu shot varies each year, because there are multiple strains of the flu that spread each season, according to the FDA. Each vaccine is formulated to target three or four of the “most likely to circulate” strains each year, but figuring out which strains to include in the seasonal flu shot is somewhat of an educated guessing game.

And, while the flu shot doesn’t become a topic of conversation until September for most people, researchers from several federal agencies spend the entire year studying the flu season prior and preparing for the next.

The FDA, World Health Organization, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention review global data each year to determine which strains to include in the vaccine—a decision that has to be made months in advance of the next flu season. The strains for this year’s flu shot were picked in March.

“One of the challenges in fighting flu is that the viruses can change their genetic make-up rapidly—not only between flu seasons, but also during the course of a single season,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., said in a statement. “As a result, the seasonal influenza vaccine needs to be evaluated annually to see whether its composition needs to be adjusted.”

And that is what researchers believe is one of the reasons last year’s flu season was so deadly—the virus mutated.

“We guessed right about the common strains that dominated last year’s flu season,” Gottlieb said. “It’s now believed that part of the reason that the vaccine was not as protective is that the flu strain used to manufacture the vaccine mutated very subtly during the development process.”

Those who received the flu shot in 2017 still developed antibodies to ward off the virus, but due to the slight changes the virus had already undergone, those antibodies weren’t enough of a match for the mutated virus.

“This isn’t the first time that the vaccine strains have deviated in some important ways from the influenza strain that ends up circulating during the flu season,” Gottlieb said. “But we’ve learned a lot of lessons from these highly unfortunate incidents. And we’ve improved our scientific methods to reduce the odds that it happens again.”

Improvements made to the 2018 flu vaccine include replacing two of last year’s influenza strains with potentially better matches. And, so far, that new vaccine seems to be on target.

Based on current flu patterns in the Southern hemisphere, Gottlieb says, the 2018 flu vaccine should be effective.

So, should you get the flu shot this year? Yes. The FDA stresses that the seasonal shot is still the most effective way to fight off the flu—not only for yourself, but for those around you.

Last year, most of the children who died from the flu had not been vaccinated, the agency said, adding that even if a person contracts the flu, a flu shot could lessen its severity.

The flu shot is recommended by both the FDA and CDC for those ages 6 months and older, especially those in high-risk groups: pregnant women, senior citizens, and young children.

About the Author
By Jaclyn Gallucci
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Health

Tensed teenage girl writing on paper
SuccessColleges and Universities
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
21 minutes ago
Dr. Javier Cárdenas is the director of the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute NeuroPerformance Innovation Center.
Commentaryconcussions
Fists, not football: There is no concussion protocol for domestic violence survivors
By Javier CárdenasDecember 12, 2025
2 hours ago
Healthmeal delivery
The Best Meal Delivery Services for Weight Loss of 2025: Dietitian Approved
By Christina SnyderDecember 11, 2025
22 hours ago
Best protein lead image
HealthDietary Supplements
The 8 Best Protein Powders of 2025: How to Choose, According to an RD
By Christina SnyderDecember 9, 2025
3 days ago
Transparent Labs Creatine HMB as best creatine
HealthDietary Supplements
The Best Creatine Supplements of 2025: Tested and Approved
By Christina SnyderDecember 9, 2025
3 days ago
Jon Rosemberg
CommentaryProductivity
The cult of productivity is killing us
By Jon RosembergDecember 9, 2025
3 days ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Success
At 18, doctors gave him three hours to live. He played video games from his hospital bed—and now, he’s built a $10 million-a-year video game studio
By Preston ForeDecember 10, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Palantir cofounder calls elite college undergrads a ‘loser generation’ as data reveals rise in students seeking support for disabilities, like ADHD
By Preston ForeDecember 11, 2025
24 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Investing
Baby boomers have now 'gobbled up' nearly one-third of America's wealth share, and they're leaving Gen Z and millennials behind
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 8, 2025
4 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
‘We have not seen this rosy picture’: ADP’s chief economist warns the real economy is pretty different from Wall Street’s bullish outlook
By Eleanor PringleDecember 11, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Uncategorized
Transforming customer support through intelligent AI operations
By Lauren ChomiukNovember 26, 2025
16 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
5 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.