• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Commentarydefense budget

I Used to Direct the Missile Defense Agency. America Needs New Weapons

By
Henry Obering III
Henry Obering III
and
Bethany Cianciolo
Bethany Cianciolo
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Henry Obering III
Henry Obering III
and
Bethany Cianciolo
Bethany Cianciolo
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 5, 2018, 1:29 PM ET

One might imagine that using a beam of light as a weapon is a recent military development, but the practice may date back more than 2,000 years. Legend has it that Archimedes, a Greek mathematician and engineer, used mirrors to direct the sun’s rays at approaching enemy ships to try to set their sails on fire. Today, high-energy laser and high-power microwave systems—or “directed energy” weapons, which use focused electromagnetic energy—have been shown to work and could combat a variety of emerging threats, but more investment is needed to bring them into the hands of our warfighters more quickly to protect the American people.

With the Pentagon’s long-anticipated Missile Defense Review expected to be released soon, it is important for government and defense decision-makers to understand directed energy’s applications for missile defense. Directed energy weapons reach targets at the speed of light, and have much larger magazines, cost less per shot, and track targets with precision far beyond traditional kinetic weapons. These characteristics make directed energy weapons uniquely capable of combating threats from hypersonic missiles (missiles that can fly at more than five times the speed of sound), as well as from the ballistic missile defense challenges from countries like North Korea dominating the headlines over the past several months. High-energy lasers, for example, could destroy a missile by burning through critical structures, control surfaces, and/or control systems, causing the missile to structurally fail or become uncontrollable.

Investing in offensive hypersonic capabilities and hypersonic missile defense is a top priority for the Department of Defense (DoD), according to the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, Dr. Michael Griffin. It’s also a priority for other world powers. Our adversaries are developing hypersonic weapons and maneuvering missiles that threaten the United States’ ability to project power. Most immediately, foreign adversaries like China and Russia pose a threat to the Navy’s carrier battle groups and entire surface fleet, in addition to forward-deployed and land-based forces. As detailed in the updated National Security and National Defense Strategies, the Trump Administration is reemphasizing the imperative of military dominance—not mere parity—to protect the American people from adversaries who are developing new offensive capabilities.

The reality, however, is that the DoD has been underinvesting in many of the military’s defense capabilities over the past 10 years, including directed energy and hypersonic weapons. Compounding the problem are some disappointing facts about our defense acquisition system: Back in March, Dr. Griffin revealed during a keynote presentation that the Pentagon takes approximately 16.5 years to acquire new technologies and bring them from statement of need to deployment, with many layers of unnecessary costs as well as delays. This is simply unacceptable.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 increases defense discretionary funding by $80 billion in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 and by $85 billion in FY 2019, opening the door for the United States to implement strategies for renewed dominance. However, Congressional appropriators, the Department of Defense, and industry partners will need to act decisively to fund and deliver needed capabilities. The United States should invest $2 billion to $3 billion annually to develop the directed energy technologies and weapons needed to counter the threats the nation faces.

I had the privilege of serving as the director of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) when the United States began the deployment of the successful missile defense systems we rely upon today. The MDA enjoyed the funding support of both the Bush Administration and Congress, and had the authority to execute outside of the DoD acquisition system in developing and deploying missile defense. That flexibility was key to rapidly developing and fielding missile defense systems to meet the emerging threat. The development and deployment of directed energy weapons to meet today’s emerging threats will take similar flexibility and empowerment.

Dr. Griffin has confirmed that DoD’s top policy priority is restoring speed to the acquisition system. We all need to help him.

In order to more quickly develop and field directed energy capabilities, we must take a few immediate next steps. First, we must begin to address operational considerations, such as test simulation, training approaches and infrastructure, how directed energy weapons will be used on the battlefield, and how they’ll be integrated with existing command and control systems. Second, industry and academia must continue the momentum in building awareness of directed energy’s capabilities, which supports decision-makers in advocating on behalf of warfighters. Third, we must educate warfighters about what these weapons can offer and make prototypes available for them to test.

Giving thought to these areas now will ensure fielding directed energy weapons is not hindered when systems are ready. These efforts will also build the warfighters’ trust that these weapons will perform in combat, as they have been told and as they have seen in training.

Directed energy weapons are not the answer to all of our challenges, and they will not replace kinetic weapons, but they are essential to countering specific threats and providing dominance across land, air, sea, and space. The only question in my mind is whether the United States will achieve that dominance before an adversary does.

The next generation of missile defense should not be a small evolution. It needs to be a revolution. I am more confident today than I have been in a long time about our defense and security posture. But for that confidence to be realized, the nation must rise to the task. The combination of the Trump Administration’s strategy, DoD’s vision and leadership, Congressional action, maturing technology, and a ready and able domestic industrial base will enable us to do so. It is not an option; it is imperative.

Henry “Trey” Obering, III is a Booz Allen Hamilton Executive Vice President based in McLean, Virginia. He retired from the U.S. Air Force as a Lieutenant General with more than 35 years of experience in space and defense systems development, integration, and operations.

About the Authors
By Henry Obering III
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By Bethany Cianciolo
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Commentary

Matt Rogers
CommentaryInfrastructure
I built the first iPhone with Steve Jobs. The AI industry is at risk of repeating an early smartphone mistake
By Matt RogersDecember 4, 2025
12 hours ago
Jerome Powell
CommentaryFederal Reserve
Fed officials like the mystique of being seen as financial technocrats, but it’s time to demystify the central bank
By Alexander William SalterDecember 4, 2025
12 hours ago
Rakesh Kumar
CommentarySemiconductors
China does not need Nvidia chips in the AI war — export controls only pushed it to build its own AI machine
By Rakesh KumarDecember 3, 2025
2 days ago
Rochelle Witharana is Chief Financial and Investment Officer for The California Wellness Foundation
Commentarydiversity and inclusion
Fund managers from diverse backgrounds are delivering standout returns and the smart money is slowly starting to pay attention
By Rochelle WitharanaDecember 3, 2025
2 days ago
Ayesha and Stephen Curry (L) and Arndrea Waters King and Martin Luther King III (R), who are behind Eat.Play.Learn and Realize the Dream, respectively.
Commentaryphilanthropy
Why time is becoming the new currency of giving
By Arndrea Waters King and Ayesha CurryDecember 2, 2025
2 days ago
Trump
CommentaryTariffs and trade
The trade war was never going to fix our deficit
By Daniel BunnDecember 2, 2025
2 days ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Two months into the new fiscal year and the U.S. government is already spending more than $10 billion a week servicing national debt
By Eleanor PringleDecember 4, 2025
14 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
‘Godfather of AI’ says Bill Gates and Elon Musk are right about the future of work—but he predicts mass unemployment is on its way
By Preston ForeDecember 4, 2025
10 hours ago
placeholder alt text
North America
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos commit $102.5 million to organizations combating homelessness across the U.S.: ‘This is just the beginning’
By Sydney LakeDecember 2, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Ford workers told their CEO 'none of the young people want to work here.' So Jim Farley took a page out of the founder's playbook
By Sasha RogelbergNovember 28, 2025
6 days ago
placeholder alt text
Health
Bill Gates decries ‘significant reversal in child deaths’ as nearly 5 million kids will die before they turn 5 this year
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 4, 2025
21 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs and the $38 trillion national debt: Kevin Hassett sees ’big reductions’ in deficit while Scott Bessent sees a ‘shrinking ice cube’
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 4, 2025
8 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.