• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
FinanceTaxes

The IRS doesn’t want your $100 million checks

By
Tom Huddleston Jr.
Tom Huddleston Jr.
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Tom Huddleston Jr.
Tom Huddleston Jr.
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 14, 2015, 10:28 AM ET
492689153
Businessman running along sidewalk with oversized chequePhotograph by Getty Images/Cultura RM

Here’s some bad news for anyone with deep pockets and a hefty tax bill you want to wipe out in one fell swoop.

The IRS says the government will stop accepting checks of $100 million or more starting next year, according to The Associated Press. Instead, taxpayers with massive IRS bills will have to pay down their tabs with multiple checks worth no more than $99,999,999.99 each, or they will have to wire their payments electronically.

The AP, citing recent memos from the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, says the Federal Reserve can only process checks of $100 million or more by hand, which leaves more room for the possibility of theft, fraud or human error.

Of course, this would seem to be a problem only for a small segment of the country, as the IRS reportedly accepted 14 checks for more than $99,999,999 this year. The agency didn’t reveal whether those checks were from individual taxpayers or from businesses. That’s despite the Fed saying federal agencies have been banned from depositing checks larger than that for years.

The AP notes that, among the 400 taxpayers with the highest 2012 income tracked by the IRS, the average tax bill was $56 million. What’s more, the IRS said last year that more than 90% of taxpayers filed their returns electronically. In other words, we’re not exactly experiencing a giant check epidemic, but it was apparently worth a memo.

About the Author
By Tom Huddleston Jr.
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Finance

Real EstateHousing
A ‘new era’ in the housing market is about to begin as affordability finally improves ‘for the first time in a bunch of years,’ economist says
By Jason MaDecember 14, 2025
8 hours ago
Middle EastMilitary
Attacker who killed US troops in Syria was a recent recruit to security forces and was suspected of Islamic State ties prior to shooting
By Abby Sewell and The Associated PressDecember 14, 2025
9 hours ago
AsiaChina
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank’s first president defends China’s role as ‘responsible stakeholder’ in a less multilateral world
By Nicholas GordonDecember 14, 2025
11 hours ago
PoliticsDonald Trump
Trump admits he can’t tell if the GOP will control the House after next year’s elections. ‘I don’t know when all of this money is going to kick in’
By Jason MaDecember 14, 2025
11 hours ago
EconomyFederal Reserve
Kevin Hassett says he’d be happy to talk to Trump everyday as Fed chair, but the president’s opinion would have ‘no weight’ on the FOMC
By Jason MaDecember 14, 2025
13 hours ago
Investingspace
Alphabet poised for another paper gain as SpaceX valuation jumps
By Edward Ludlow and BloombergDecember 14, 2025
15 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for $800 in 1976—today it’d be worth up to $400 billion
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Uncategorized
Transforming customer support through intelligent AI operations
By Lauren ChomiukNovember 26, 2025
18 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
More financially distressed farmers are expected to lose their property soon as loan repayments and incomes continue to falter
By Jason MaDecember 13, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Energy
Everything the Trump administration is doing in Venezuela involves oil and regime change—even if the White House won’t admit it
By Jordan BlumDecember 14, 2025
19 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
3 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.