• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
IBM

Some Cancer Treatment Recommendations From IBM’s Watson Were Unsafe, Report Finds

By
Chris Morris
Chris Morris
Former Contributing Writer
By
Chris Morris
Chris Morris
Former Contributing Writer
July 27, 2018, 10:43 AM ET

IBM’s Watson could need a little more time in medical school, if a new report is accurate.

Documents reviewed by Stat, a medical news site, show the artificial intelligence supercomputer has shown “multiple examples of unsafe and incorrect treatment recommendations” for cancer patients.

The allegations, it’s worth noting, were made two years ago and no patients were harmed.

Incomplete training is being cited for the gaps, says the report. IBM researchers and doctors at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center educated the system using hypothetical cases, rather than actual patient data.

IBM, though, takes issue with the claims, saying “it’s not an accurate or timely representation.”

“Today, Watson for Oncology is trained to help oncologists treat 13 cancers,” the company said. “Our oncology and genomics offerings are used by 230 hospitals around the world and have supported care for more than 84,000 patients, which is almost double the number of patients as of the end of 2017. … We have learned and improved Watson Health based on continuous feedback from clients, new scientific evidence and new cancers and treatment alternatives. This includes 11 software releases for even better functionality during the past year, including national guidelines for cancers ranging from colon to liver cancer.

“We remain absolutely committed to Watson Health to give providers and professionals the technology and expertise to help transform health for people everywhere.”

The report comes a little over a year after the American Society of Clinical Oncology gave Watson high marks for its cancer treatment plan suggestions.

AI training is one of the most challenging aspects for Watson. To adequately adapt for various scenarios, the system must learn nuance, which requires a lot of information and often in unusual ways. For example, one test the system undergoes, though not necessarily for medical testing, is called the “muffin challenge,” where Watson must differentiate between the tops of a blueberry muffin or the picture of a curled up Chihuahua.

The system has beaten most humans in that test.

About the Author
By Chris MorrisFormer Contributing Writer

Chris Morris is a former contributing writer at Fortune, covering everything from general business news to the video game and theme park industries.

See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.