Blue Apron Holdings Inc. signage is displayed during the company's initial public offering (IPO) on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., on Thursday, June 29, 2017. Meal-kit delivery company Blue Apron Holdings Inc. climbed in its trading debut after slashing the price of its initial public offering. Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Michael Nagle — Bloomberg via Getty Images

Unicorns aren’t real, and neither are some valuations.

By Bloomberg
August 2, 2017

Unicorns aren’t real, and neither are the valuations ascribed to many of the startups that say they’re worth $1 billion or more.

About half of private companies with valuations exceeding $1 billion, known as unicorns, wouldn’t have earned the mythical title without the use of complex stock mechanics, according to a study by business professors at the University of British Columbia and Stanford University. The tools used to negotiate a higher share price with investors often come at the expense of employees and early shareholders, sometimes drastically reducing the actual value of their stock.

The chasm between public and private valuations is a topic of increasing prominence following several disappointing listings. Among them is Blue Apron Holdings Inc., which is trading well below the price venture capitalists paid in the last fundraising round.

An often-overlooked explanation for the divide is buried in investor contracts. Blue Apron, which delivers meal kits to customers, gave stock preferences to Fidelity Investments and other backers in 2015 in exchange for a $2 billion valuation. The shares included a provision to receive additional equity if an initial public offering is set below a target price. Investors took advantage of the mechanism after Blue Apron’s mediocre IPO.

The use of special investor protections has soared in recent years as startups chase dreams of becoming a unicorn. A lofty valuation can build credibility and help recruit talent in a tight labor market. But it has also complicated the already-opaque process of valuing a private business.

One provision frequently afforded to investors is called a liquidation preference. It guarantees a minimum payout in the event of an acquisition or other exit. The study found that it can exaggerate a company’s valuation by as much as 94 percent. Researchers pointed to AppNexus, a digital advertising startup. The company sold shares with a liquidation preference that guaranteed new backers at least double the amount they put in if AppNexus is acquired.

Another common tool is known as a ratchet. This is what came back to bite Blue Apron after its IPO. Payments provider Square Inc. faced a similar issue when it went public. Oscar Insurance Corp. and Pivotal Software Inc. have also doled out ratchets to shareholders. Ratchets can inflate a startup’s value by 56 percent or more, the study said.

The study looked at 116 unicorns founded after 1994, with average valuations of $2.7 billion. Researchers found that 11 percent of companies, including HomeAway and SolarCity, used preferential stock to boost their valuations to more than twice what they would be worth using the study’s fair value estimates. “Our results suggest that more attention should be paid to the contractual terms between investors and companies,” the report said.

But not every startup is grossly overvalued. For example, researchers found Uber Technologies Inc. has only one instance of a liquidation preference. The study said Uber’s valuation of $69 billion is only 12 percent higher than the fair value approximation. Even at the lower estimate, Uber would still be the world’s most valuable tech startup.

Eschewing these financial instruments doesn’t guarantee favorable performance on public markets, though. Snap Inc. was careful to minimize the use of special protections for its VC backers. Since going public in March, the social media company’s shares have dropped 23 percent below the IPO price.

SPONSORED FINANCIAL CONTENT

You May Like