That’s the argument many Wall Street analysts are using to justify their “Buy” or “Hold” ratings on the social media giant that owns Snapchat. At least 13 different financial firms, which all helped sell Snap shares at its March IPO, were finally unleashed Monday, allowing their analysts to legally release their opinions and research on the stock. Unsurprisingly, the majority were “Buys,” with a few “Holds.” That also helped balance out the wave of “Sells” smaller Wall Street firms came out with immediately following the offering.

While those more bearish calls focused on the firm’s flagging user growth, nonexistent profits, and strong competitors, the Snap bulls are pointing to Snap’s currently low monetization as compared to for example Facebook, as a sign that the company has so much more to grow.

The firm Stifel, for example, noted that as of the fourth quarter of 2016, Snap received $6.66 per user annually in ad revenue. Facebook, on the other hand, got $80.79 per user, while Twitter made $50.18 per user.

So Snap has a lot of room to play catch up.

While Snap’s numbers pale in comparison to its competitors now, bulls say its user base is loyal enough and engaged enough that advertisers will start lobbing even more of their business at Snap — and lobbing it fast.

Still, the bulls are acknowledging there are risks with betting that a still unprofitable company will prove itself three, four, and five years down the line.

Here’s a roundup of what some analysts said:

Morgan Stanley analysts, led by Brian Nowak, wrote in a Monday note that Snapchat has a lot of room for fast growth. In fact, they expect Snap’s visible advertising inventory to become 13 times larger over the next three years. The bank has a “Buy” rating and $28 target price on the stock.

Snap, the analysts said is “monetizing at only 1/50th the rate of Facebook: Second, Snap’s ad monetization is still in its infancy as, by our math, Snap’s 2016 ad load was 0.6 ads [per user every hour], vs. about 50 at core Facebook mobile, about 100 at Twitter, and about 7 at Instagram. Our base case calls for Snap to increase its ad load to about 8 ads [per user every hour] by 2020 as advertiser demand grows.”

Oppenheimer, on the other hand, gave the stock the equivalent of a “Hold.” In 2016, Snap reported a loss of $459.4 million. By 2022, Oppenheimer expects the company to have earnings (specifically earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $4.3 billion. That’s nearly six times Twitter’s 2016 EBITDA.

“We forecast $4.3 billion of adjusted EBITDA in fiscal year 2022, or 37% EBITDA margins. We believe Snap Inc. has the opportunity to create significant leverage on gross margins as cloud computing becomes less expensive and as the company gains pricing power with Discover publisher partners,” the analysts wrote. “While Snapchat is undoubtedly best suited for younger users, our proprietary survey suggests older users would join for Publisher content or if their “friends” join.”

J.P. Morgan Chase analysts also gave the stock a “Hold” rating and a $24 price target, saying they don’t expect profits until 2019.

The analysts went with a “Hold” instead of a “Buy” because of an increasingly competitive social media atmosphere, and a likely “lack of profit until 2019 as costs are tied more to engagement than revenue and it will take time for Snap to scale; and 3) Our view that even with strong revenue growth and leverage factored into our model (likely above consensus), valuation is already at a healthy premium—12x 2018 estimated revenue of $2.6 billion.”

A Stifel team gave the stock a $24 price target and a “Hold,” saying the stock would be closer to a “Buy” if only it would fall to $20.