Be seeded, be resented.

To be clear, I’m a firm believer in the idea of meritocracy. The best companies should get funded, and the crappy ones should fold so their employees can move on to more worthwhile pursuits.

What I don’t quite get, however, is why so many people believe venture capitalists are infallible arbiters of what rocks and what sucks. These are many of the same venture capitalists who helped inflate the dotcom bubble before it burst — getting its recessionary goo all over America. And the same ones who slowed down their investing pace in the middle aughts, when companies like Facebook were just getting started. And who gave absurd later-stage valuations to companies like Zynga (ZNGA). And who let Andrew Mason cash out all of that Groupon (GRPN) stock pre-IPO. And who do you think first put money into Solyndra?

My point isn’t that venture capitalists are dummies. It’s that they make mistakes. Just take a look at the companies that Bessemer Venture Partners admits to passing on. Every firm has them, and it’s not unreasonable to think that certain quality startups fall through the cracks. Or that some undeserving companies get to move forward. In fact, the “Series A crunch” likely means that more errors are being made, rather than fewer (since VCs are sorting through an increased number of seed-funded deals, without getting more hours in the day).

One more thing: Before insulting all those “dopey angel investors,” it might be worth understanding why they backed so many companies in the first place. Research has shown that angels have the best chance of producing positive returns by investing in more, not fewer, startups. And I don’t mean five rather than two. I mean 50 rather than 10.

But don’t let me ruin the fun of feeling superior to all those folks in Silicon Valley who foolishly chased their dreams (or who helped others to do so). I’m sure that venture capitalists will make everything work out okay.

Sign up for Dan’s daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com