• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Trendingnow

1

As U.S. Treasury intervened in the bond market, the Netherlands rushed 86 tons of gold out of America because of ‘geopolitical unrest’

2

'Critical employees will begin to retire': Trump’s new pay plan will deny most federal roles a raise, and it has workers warning of a retention crunch

3

New LA Angels owner Stan Kroenke is quietly America's largest private landowner, boasting 2.7 million acres and besting Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos

1

As U.S. Treasury intervened in the bond market, the Netherlands rushed 86 tons of gold out of America because of ‘geopolitical unrest’

2

'Critical employees will begin to retire': Trump’s new pay plan will deny most federal roles a raise, and it has workers warning of a retention crunch

3

New LA Angels owner Stan Kroenke is quietly America's largest private landowner, boasting 2.7 million acres and besting Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos

Earnings Smackdown: The best and worst Apple analysts

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 21, 2010, 5:53 AM ET
Google source logo
Add Fortune on Google for similar content.

The bloggers beat the pros once again this quarter, but not quite as handily as before



Bloggers: Green. Pros: Pink. Click to enlarge.

The professional analysts who track Apple (AAPL) for banks and brokerage houses may have been surprised by the $15.7 billion in revenue the company reported Tuesday — an all-time record for Apple in what is traditionally one of its weakest quarters.

But the blogger-analysts we polled in advance of the earnings report were not. In fact, their consensus estimates for both revenue ($15.74 billion) and earnings ($3.66 per share) were remarkably close to the actual results ($15.7 billion and $3.51, respectively).

Yes, once again the amateurs have beaten the professionals at their own game, although it must be said that the pros did considerably better in our Apple Earnings Smackdown this quarter than they ever have before.

A handful of pros performed quite well, and in four categories — gross margin and iPhone, iPod and iPad unit sales — the Street’s consensus was actually better than the bloggers’.

But in the categories that matter most — the top and bottom line numbers — the bloggers outperformed the pros by roughly two to one.

We’ve ranked the analysts by the combined accuracy of their revenue and EPS estimates in the table above (click to enlarge). The bloggers are wearing the green shirts, the pros are in red. [For a more sophisticated ranking, using more criteria, see Oh Oh, It’s Magic at Deagol’s AAPL Model.]

Below the fold: some shout-outs and a color-coded chart of all the categories we tracked. (Green is good, red is bad.)



Green: best estimate. Red: worst. Light green: 2nd or 3rd best. Pink: 2nd or 3rd worst.

For readers who have been following our quarterly competition, there are some familiar names among the bloggers in the top 10: Daniel Tello, Alexis Cabot, Andy Zaky and Turley Muller are regulars; Dennis Hildebrand, Horace Dediu and Jeff Fosberg are newcomers.

And kudos to the three professionals who made it to the top 10: Oppenheimer’s Yair Reiner, Merrill Lynch’s Scott Craig and Serne Agee’s Vijay Rakesh. We’ve been asking for the pros to step up their game, and this quarter they seem to have done it.

At least some of them did. We’re not sure what to say about names at the bottom of the list, which include some of the most famous Apple analysts on the Street.

In defense of Barclays’s Ben Reitzes — who came in last — his estimates were filed on June 22, before the launch of the iPhone 4 or Steve Jobs’ announcement of the sale of the 3 millionth iPad. Reitzes may have issued a more up-to-date (and more accurate) report, but he didn’t send it to me.

See also:

  • Apple Q3 blow-out: Profits up nearly 78%
  • Apple’s blow-out second quarter: The bloggers called it. The Street blew it.
  • Apple’s Q1 2010 earnings: The Street’s big miss
  • Apple earnings: How the analysts got it so wrong
  • Apple’s 2009 Q3: Analyzing the analysts
  • Apple’s 2009 Q2: Analyzing the analysts
  • Apple’s 2009 Q1: Analyzing the analysts
  • Apple’s 2008 Q4: Analyzing the analysts

[Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter @philiped]

About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Google source logo
Add Fortune on Google for similar content.

Latest in


Most Popular

Fortune Secondary Logo
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • World's Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
  • Lists Calendar
Sections
  • Finance
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Features
  • Leadership
  • Health
  • Commentary
  • Success
  • Retail
  • Mpw
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • CEO Initiative
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Conferences
  • Europe
  • Newsletters
  • Personal Finance
  • Environment
  • Magazine
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
  • Group Subscriptions
About Us
  • About Us
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • About Us
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Instagram icon
  • TikTok icon
  • YouTube icon

    Latest in


    Most Popular

    © 2026 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
    FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.