{"headlines":[{"id":1422251,"content_type":"free full","is_magazine_content":"non-magazine","url":"\/2015\/11\/11\/general-mills-sued-cheerios-protein\/","title":"Lawsuit Casts Doubt on Cheerios Protein Claims","content":"\u003Cp\u003EGeneral Mills has been slapped with a lawsuit from the Center for Science in the Public Interest over its new Cheerios Protein product.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EThe non-profit group claims that the cereal maker has overblown the health benefits of the new food, \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/www.buzzfeed.com\/venessawong\/general-mills-is-being-sued-over-cheerios-protein-claims#.slM6ZQ85V1\u0022\u003Eaccording to BuzzFeed\u003C\/a\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EThe lawsuit states that the added protein is actually misleading given that the serving size for Cheerios Protein prescribed on the label is greater than for a regular helping of Cheerios.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EFor instance, a regular serving of Cheerios has 3g of protein, while there are 7g in a single serving of Cheerios Protein. But the difference is that a serving of regular Cheerios is 3\/4 a cup compared to a cup and a half for Cheerios Protein, according to BuzzFeed.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EThe lawsuit wants General Mills to stop its \u201cfalse and misleading marketing practices with regard to Cheerios Protein.\u0026#8221;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u0026#8220;Consumers who buy Cheerios Protein probably think they\u2019re doing themselves a favor, and that this more expensive product is essentially a protein-fortified version of original Cheerios,\u201d said CSPI litigation director Maia Kats \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/cspinet.org\/new\/201511091.html\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003Ein a statement\u003C\/a\u003E. \u201cIn fact, the main thing that distinguishes Cheerios Protein from original Cheerios is the huge amount of sugar and extra calories.\u0026#8221;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EShe added, \u0026#8220;With 17 times as much sugar as original Cheerios, Cheerios Protein is actually more conducive to diabetes, weight gain, heart disease, and tooth decay.\u201d\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cWe don\u2019t normally respond to these publicity-seeking lawsuits from CSPI \u2013 but we do reject their comparison,\u0026#8221; according to General Mills spokesman Mike Siemienas in an emailed statement to \u003Cem\u003EFortune\u003C\/em\u003E. \u0026#8220;An equal amount of Cheerios Protein contains 18% more protein by weight than original Cheerios.\u201d\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003E\u0026#8220;Original Cheerios does contain 3 grams of protein per serving \u2013 and it\u2019s clearly a great cereal choice,\u0026#8221; he added. \u0026#8220;\u003C\/span\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EBut it doesn\u2019t meet the FDA requirement as a good source of protein.\u0026#8221;\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003E\u0026#8220;Cheerios Protein contains 7 grams of protein per serving \u2013 and it does qualify as a good source of high-quality protein under the FDA standard,\u0026#8221; said Siemienas. \u0026#8220;\u003C\/span\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003ECheerios Protein is accurately labeled \u2013 and provides a good source of protein in every labeled serving.\u0026#8221;\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p1\u0022\u003EIn October, \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/10\/05\/cheerios-gluten-wheat\/\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003EGeneral Mills issued a recall of some boxes of Cheerios\u003C\/a\u003E over concerns some were contaminated with gluten despite being labeled gluten-free.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","time":{"pretty":"November 11, 2015","published":"2015-11-11 05:06:52","updated":"2015-11-11 05:06:52","minute":"5:06 PM EST","is_same_day":true,"is_home_pop":true},"comment_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/general-mills-sued-cheerios-protein\/","absolute_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/general-mills-sued-cheerios-protein\/","redirect_url":"","partner":"","outbrain_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/general-mills-sued-cheerios-protein\/","outbrain_footer":true,"outbrain_right_rail":true,"short_title":"Non-Profit CSPI Suing General Mills Over Cheerios Protein"},{"id":1421251,"content_type":"free full","is_magazine_content":"non-magazine","url":"\/2015\/11\/11\/cable-tv-executives-replaced-voters\/","title":"How Cable TV Executives Replaced Voters","content":"\u003Cp\u003ESubjecting the 15-candidate GOP field to blunt force trauma, Fox Business Network bounced Chris Christie (surging in New Hampshire) and Mike Huckabee (the 2008 Iowa caucus winner) from the main debate stage. Even worse, the network turned Lindsey Graham into an Orwellian un-person by barring the South Carolina senator from even the undercard debate. This poll-propelled decision came just as John McCain (the 2008 Republican nominee) was endorsing Graham in a New Hampshire TV ad.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EFox Business Network seemingly cherry-picked the four national polls that it used in clearing the debate stage. The \u0026#8220;Eight Is Enough for Fox\u0026#8221; main debate was designed to provide extra TV drama and ratings by giving Donald Trump and Ben Carson more time to preen on camera. With the Fox Business questioners on good behavior after the recent CNBC donnybrook, Tuesday night probably will prove to have been merely a minor footnote on the road to the nomination.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EBut the precedent it set with its heavy-handed exclusionary rule for debate participation is major. A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, primary voters got to winnow the presidential field rather than cable TV executives.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EBack in May, I pointed out the \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/blog\/debating-debates\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003ECatch-22\u003C\/a\u003E created by Republican Chairman Reince Priebus\u0026#8217; timorous decision to let the cable TV networks set their own criteria for limiting the size of debates: \u0026#8220;The only way to rise in the polls is to do well in the debates. But to participate in the debates, you have to rise in the polls.\u0026#8221;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EWhat makes matters far worse is that 2015 has provided us with dramatic evidence that election surveys have become about as reliable as divining rods.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EIn the Israeli, British and, most recently, Canadian national elections, pollsters were grotesquely wrong about either the result or the margin. The same thing happened in last week\u0026#8217;s Kentucky gubernatorial election, which was won handily by the supposedly trailing Republican candidate Matt Bevin. The Kentucky polling proved so unreliable that the \u003Cem\u003ELexington Herald-Leader\u003C\/em\u003E, which sponsors the Bluegrass Poll, announced after the election that the paper had fired its \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/www.kentucky.com\/2015\/11\/04\/4122311_a-note-to-readers-on-the-bluegrass.html?rh=1\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003Eoutside pollster\u003C\/a\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EA major reason why polling has fallen off the precipice is a dramatic drop in the response rate to telephone surveys from 60% during the 1980s to single digits today. Adding to the problem is that younger voters, especially, only use cell phones, which legally cannot be automatically dialed like land lines. The decline in the media business also has prompted many newspapers to hire the cheapest\u2014rather than best\u2014polling firms. (In the current \u003Cem\u003ENew Yorker\u003C\/em\u003E, \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/magazine\/2015\/11\/16\/politics-and-the-new-machine\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003EJill Lepore\u003C\/a\u003E smartly surveys the woeful state of polling.)\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cdiv class=\u0022video-wrapper\u0022 data-ratio=\u00220.56363636363636\u0022 data-pos=\u00221\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\u003Cobject id=\u0022bc-video-4607033099001-1\u0022 class=\u0022BrightcoveExperience\u0022\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022bgcolor\u0022 value=\u0022#FFFFFF\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022width\u0022 value=\u0022550\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022height\u0022 value=\u0022310\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022playerID\u0022 value=\u00223160175193001\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022playerKey\u0022 value=\u0022AQ~~,AAAB668kGak~,LMlvL4u4ShOTHD9z00VquajMOcH97tcW\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022isVid\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022isUI\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022videoSmoothing\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022seamlessTabbing\u0022 value=\u0022false\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022swliveconnect\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022dynamicStreaming\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022autoStart\u0022 value=\u0022false\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022@videoPlayer\u0022 value=\u00224607033099001\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022linkBaseURL\u0022 value=\u0022http:\/\/for.tn\/1MKC2h3\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022includeAPI\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022templateLoadHandler\u0022 value=\u0022Fortune_onTemplateLoad\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022templateReadyHandler\u0022 value=\u0022Fortune_onTemplateReady\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022wmode\u0022 value=\u0022opaque\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022adServerURL\u0022 value=\u0022http:\/\/pubads.g.doubleclick.net\/gampad\/ads?env=vp\u0026#038;gdfp_req=1\u0026#038;impl=s\u0026#038;output=xml_vast2\u0026#038;iu=\/8484\/fort\/video_bc\/leadership_bc\u0026#038;sz=1000x1\u0026#038;cust_params=tags%3D2016presidentialrace%2Cbobbyjindal%2Cchrischristie%2Cfox%2Cfoxsgopdebate%2Cgop%2Cleadership%2Cpresidentialcandidates%2Crepublicandebate%26ch%3Dleadership%26topic%3D2016presidentialrace\u0026#038;unviewed_position_start=1\u0026#038;correlator=timestamp\u0022\/\u003E\u003C\/object\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003C\/div\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\tbrightcove.createExperiences();\n\t\t\t\u003C\/script\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ESadly, the reliability of polls has hit rock bottom at just the moment when they have more political influence than pioneering survey-taker George Gallup could have ever imagined. The debates are only one example of our poll-propelled politics. Equally alarming is the way that the Political Prediction Industry has trumped everything else in the 2016 campaign.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EAs someone who has been covering presidential politics since 1980, I cannot think of a time when so much effort was spent handicapping who was going to win the White House\u2014and so little time was spent analyzing what he or she might do when they got to the Oval Office. Mouthing off on \u003Cem\u003EMorning Joe \u003C\/em\u003Eabout who will corral the Republican nomination is undeniably more fun than lassoing the details in the GOP contenders\u0026#8217; tax plans. But the virtue of substantive reporting is that it might help voters clarify their decisions, while glib horserace verdicts go under the heading of \u0026#8220;often wrong, but never in doubt.\u0026#8221;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ELast spring, the oft-repeated Conventional Wisdom was that only one of three Republicans would be standing triumphant amid the balloon drop at the Cleveland Convention. Even though the GOP could reckon their candidates by the dozens, it simply had to be Scott Walker (who has since dropped out), Jeb Bush (who is currently depicted as flat-lining), or Marco Rubio.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EThese days, the party line has dramatically shifted. In Sunday\u0026#8217;s \u003Cem\u003EPolitico\u003C\/em\u003E, the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/www.politico.com\/playbook\/2015\/11\/politico-playbook-presented-by-chevron-1-year-to-election-rubio-cruz-clinton-hold-high-cards-popping-the-balloon-no-new-dirt-in-marcos-amex-bills-trumping-snl-bush-gore-headlines-manu-raju-twins-bday-wayne-berman-david-muir-211146\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003Einfluential Mike Allen\u003C\/a\u003E summarized the current DC insider analysis: \u0026#8220;The GOP race will come down to a Rubio-[Ted] Cruz final, with Rubio favored. The logic is that if Trump and Carson deflate, evangelicals will go to Cruz and everyone else will go to Rubio, and there\u2019s more \u0026#8216;everyone else.\u0026#8217;\u201d And nothing in Tuesday night\u0026#8217;s debate changed that pundit-driven prophesy.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EYes, 2016 could play out that way. But recall what has happened in the last quarter of a century when voters were finally allowed to make their preferences known in the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cul\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EIn 1992, Bill Clinton\u2014reeling from the Gennifer Flowers and draft scandals\u2014put himself back on track for the Democratic nomination with a surprising second-place finish in New Hampshire.\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EIn 1996, ultra-conservative columnist Pat Buchanan defeated establishment favorite Bob Dole by 2,000 votes in the New Hampshire primary.\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EIn 2000, John McCain, running against the Bush dynasty, swept the New Hampshire GOP primary with nearly half the vote. George W. Bush was on the ropes until he made a dramatic comeback in the South Carolina primary.\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EEven though Democrat Howard Dean led in national polling in November 2003, he collapsed in the early 2004 Iowa caucuses (prompting the late-night Dean scream) and then in the New Hampshire primary.\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EBarack Obama averaged an \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2008\/president\/nh\/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html#polls\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003E8-percentage point lead\u003C\/a\u003E in all the polls in the days before the January 2008 New Hampshire primary. Hillary Clinton gained 10 points in the final hours to force Obama into a protracted fight for the nomination that stretched into June.\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EIgnored by the press and mired in single digits in most polls, Rick Santorum surged out of nowhere to win the 2012 Iowa caucuses. And then Newt Gingrich, dismissed as a Banquo\u0026#8217;s Ghost candidate, scrambled everything by winning the South Carolina primary in a landslide.\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003C\/ul\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EMost of these upsets were not predicted even a week in advance. We are still more than 90 days from the Iowa caucuses\u2014and yet it has become journalistically unfashionable to admit (as I do) that you have no idea who will win the GOP nomination. The most dispiriting aspect of the media\u0026#8217;s coverage of the 2016 campaign is that too many pundits appear to regard voters as an annoyance getting in the way of their premature green room verdicts.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EIt\u0026#8217;s almost enough to prompt me to channel John Lennon and start singing, \u0026#8220;All we are saying is give the voters a chance.\u0026#8221;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cem\u003EThe views expressed are the author\u0026#8217;s own and not necessarily those of the Brennan Center for Justice.\u003C\/em\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cem\u003EWalter Shapiro is an award-winning political columnist who has covered the last nine presidential campaigns. Along the way, he has worked for The Washington Post, Newsweek, Time, Esquire, USA Today and, most recently, Yahoo News. He is also a lecturer in political science at Yale University\u003C\/em\u003E. \u003Cem\u003EHe can be reached by email at \u003C\/em\u003E\u003Ca href=\u0022mailto:waltershapiro@ymail.com\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003E\u003Cem\u003Ewaltershapiro@ymail.com\u003C\/em\u003E\u003C\/a\u003E\u003Cem\u003E and followed on Twitter\u003Cem\u003E \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/twitter.com\/MrWalterShapiro\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003E@MrWalterShapiro\u003C\/a\u003E. This article originally appeared on \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/blog\/how-cable-tv-executives-replaced-voters\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003EBrennancenter.org\u003C\/a\u003E.\u003C\/em\u003E\u003C\/em\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n","time":{"pretty":"November 11, 2015","published":"2015-11-11 04:57:59","updated":"2015-11-11 04:57:59","minute":"4:57 PM EST","is_same_day":true,"is_home_pop":true},"comment_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/cable-tv-executives-replaced-voters\/","absolute_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/cable-tv-executives-replaced-voters\/","redirect_url":"","partner":"","outbrain_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/cable-tv-executives-replaced-voters\/","outbrain_footer":true,"outbrain_right_rail":true,"short_title":"How Cable TV Executives Replaced Voters"},{"id":1422264,"content_type":"free full","is_magazine_content":"non-magazine","url":"\/2015\/11\/11\/koch-brothers-republican-endorsement\/","title":"The Koch Brothers Have a Big Announcement","content":"\u003Cp\u003EThe Koch Brothers are arguably the most important donors in the Republican Party, and they won\u0026#8217;t be backing any of the current candidates in the primaries, reports \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/politics\/elections\/2015\/11\/11\/charles-koch-no-backing-candidate-republican-primary\/75576772\/\u0022\u003EUSA Today\u003C\/a\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ECharles Koch, who leads Koch Industries with his brother David, told the paper that he \u0026#8220;has no plans\u0026#8221; to pick a candidate to back financially in the primaries, perhaps signalling that he isn\u0026#8217;t happy with the current state of his party.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EThe brothers \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/10\/27\/why-the-koch-brothers-arent-happy-with-the-gop-race\/\u0022\u003Ehave been on a bit of a media tour this fall\u003C\/a\u003E, and this isn\u0026#8217;t the first time they have expressed disappointment about how the primary has been going.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cIf they start saying things we think are beneficial overall and will change the trajectory of the country, then that would be good, but we have to believe also they\u2019ll follow through on it, and by and large, candidates don\u2019t do that,\u201d Charles Koch said to the paper.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EKoch did concede that he will likely help the eventual Republican nominee in the general election.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","time":{"pretty":"November 11, 2015","published":"2015-11-11 04:57:51","updated":"2015-11-11 04:57:51","minute":"4:57 PM EST","is_same_day":true,"is_home_pop":true},"comment_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/koch-brothers-republican-endorsement\/","absolute_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/koch-brothers-republican-endorsement\/","redirect_url":"","partner":"","outbrain_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/koch-brothers-republican-endorsement\/","outbrain_footer":true,"outbrain_right_rail":false,"short_title":"The Koch Brothers Have a Big Announcement"},{"id":1421742,"content_type":"free full","is_magazine_content":"non-magazine","url":"\/2015\/11\/11\/call-of-duty-black-ops-3-sales\/","title":"\u2018Call Of Duty: Black Ops 3\u2019 Generates $550 Million In 72 Hours","content":"\u003Cp\u003EActivision Blizzard has another $1 billion Call of Duty hit on its hands, if analyst forecasts are correct. Developer Treyarch\u2019s \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty: Black Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E generated over $550 million in worldwide sales in its first 72 hours.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EActivision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick said in a statement that \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty: Black Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E is the biggest entertainment premiere this year in any medium, and bigger than any theatrical opening weekend ever.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EWhile it\u2019s not the biggest \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty\u003C\/em\u003E debut of all time (that honor goes to Treyarch\u2019s \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty: Black Ops 2, \u003C\/em\u003Ewhich broke the $500 million mark in just 24 hours in 2012), Wedbush Securities analyst Michael Pachter says the game is on track to sell 22 million copies year. That is up 20% over sales last year of Sledgehammer Games\u2019 \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty: Advanced Warfare\u003C\/em\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cem\u003EBlack Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E is on track to be the sixth consecutive \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty\u003C\/em\u003E game to break the $1 billion mark. During the three-day opening, worldwide sales rose significantly over the previous two years to a new franchise mark as digital downloads of the game nearly doubled from a year ago. On Sony\u2019s PlayStation 4, \u003Cem\u003EBlack Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E set a new record as the best-selling digital full game by units sold in its first day of availability in PS4 history.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003Cform id=\u0022wpcom-iframe-form-338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932-5643bcf22ecf3\u0022 target=\u0022wpcom-iframe-338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932-5643bcf22ecf3\u0022 method=\u0022post\u0022 action=\u0022\/\/wpcomwidgets.com\/?wpcom_origin=https%3A%2F%2Ffortunedotcom.wordpress.com\u0022 style=\u0022display: none\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022width\u0022 value=\u0022450\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022height\u0022 value=\u0022400\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022frameborder\u0022 value=\u00220\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022style\u0022 value=\u0022\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022class\u0022 value=\u0022\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022scrolling\u0022 value=\u0022no\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022webkitallowfullscreen\u0022 value=\u0022\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022mozallowfullscreen\u0022 value=\u0022\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022allowfullscreen\u0022 value=\u0022\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022resize\u0022 value=\u00220\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022replace_attributes\u0022 value=\u00221\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022fallback\u0022 value=\u0022\u0026lt;p class=\u0026quot;protected-embed-fallback\u0026quot;\u0026gt;This embed is invalid\u0026lt;\/p\u0026gt;\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022_data\u0022 value=\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,a6fca4efd3867a945a2cfe2b3320c6cd6ba53415\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022_tag\u0022 value=\u0022protected-iframe\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cinput type=\u0022hidden\u0022 name=\u0022_hash\u0022 value=\u0022338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932\u0022 \/\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\u003C\/form\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003Ciframe name=\u0022wpcom-iframe-338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932-5643bcf22ecf3\u0022 id=\u0022wpcom-iframe-338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932-5643bcf22ecf3\u0022 width=\u0022450\u0022 height=\u0022400\u0022 frameborder=\u00220\u0022 scrolling=\u0022no\u0022 class=\u0022wpcom-protected-iframe \u0022\u003E\u003C\/iframe\u003E\n\t\t\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022\u003E\n\t\t( function() {\n\t\t\tvar func = function() {\n\t\t\t\tvar iframe_form = document.getElementById(\u0027wpcom-iframe-form-338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932-5643bcf22ecf3\u0027);\n\t\t\t\tvar iframe = document.getElementById(\u0027wpcom-iframe-338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932-5643bcf22ecf3\u0027);\n\t\t\t\tif ( iframe_form \u0026\u0026 iframe ) {\n\t\t\t\t\tiframe_form.submit();\n\t\t\t\t\tiframe.onload = function() {\n\t\t\t\t\t\tiframe.contentWindow.postMessage( {\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u0027msg_type\u0027: \u0027poll_size\u0027,\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\u0027frame_id\u0027: \u0027wpcom-iframe-338a52565f6a74164450403f5ac4a932-5643bcf22ecf3\u0027\n\t\t\t\t\t\t}, window.location.protocol + \u0027\/\/wpcomwidgets.com\u0027 );\n\t\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t\t}\n\n\t\t\t\t\/\/ Autosize iframe\n\t\t\t\tvar funcSizeResponse = function( e ) {\n\t\t\t\t\tvar origin = document.createElement( \u0027a\u0027 );\n\t\t\t\t\torigin.href = e.origin;\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Verify message origin\n\t\t\t\t\tif ( \u0027wpcomwidgets.com\u0027 !== origin.host )\n\t\t\t\t\t\treturn;\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Verify message is in a format we expect\n\t\t\t\t\tif ( \u0027object\u0027 !== typeof e.data || undefined === e.data.msg_type )\n\t\t\t\t\t\treturn;\n\n\t\t\t\t\tswitch ( e.data.msg_type ) {\n\t\t\t\t\t\tcase \u0027poll_size:response\u0027:\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tvar iframe = document.getElementById( e.data._request.frame_id );\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tif ( iframe \u0026\u0026 \u0027\u0027 === iframe.width )\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tiframe.width = \u0027100%\u0027;\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tif ( iframe \u0026\u0026 \u0027\u0027 === iframe.height )\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tiframe.height = parseInt( e.data.height );\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn;\n\t\t\t\t\t\tdefault:\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn;\n\t\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t\t}\n\n\t\t\t\tif ( \u0027function\u0027 === typeof window.addEventListener ) {\n\t\t\t\t\twindow.addEventListener( \u0027message\u0027, funcSizeResponse, false );\n\t\t\t\t} else if ( \u0027function\u0027 === typeof window.attachEvent ) {\n\t\t\t\t\twindow.attachEvent( \u0027onmessage\u0027, funcSizeResponse );\n\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t\tif (document.readyState === \u0027complete\u0027) { func.apply(); \/* compat for infinite scroll *\/ }\n\t\t\telse if ( document.addEventListener ) { document.addEventListener( \u0027DOMContentLoaded\u0027, func, false ); }\n\t\t\telse if ( document.attachEvent ) { document.attachEvent( \u0027onreadystatechange\u0027, func ); }\n\t\t} )();\n\t\t\u003C\/script\u003E\n\t\t\n\u003Cp\u003EAccording to John Taylor, video game analyst at AIC Research, over the past few years \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty\u003C\/em\u003E retail sales have declined during the initial release, partly because more gamers download the games directly these days rather than buying physical copies. Another factor is that because the audience has grown so large, sales have spread out more through the holidays as people wait to get the game as a gift.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cThis year\u2019s launch, based on Activision\u2019s press release, appears to be an uptick from recent years, although we really don\u2019t know what the retail compare is,\u201d Taylor says. \u201cThe fact that digital doubled suggests we could see a retail volume decline year-over-year, but that doesn\u2019t really reflect the health of the franchise.\u201d\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EJoost van Dreunen, CEO of SuperData Research, says the \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty\u003C\/em\u003E franchise continues to perform well and shows growth on the digital side as total revenues within the first 12 months continue to increase with each edition. Digital sales have risen from $235 million in 2009 with Infinity Ward\u2019s \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty: Modern Warfare 2\u003C\/em\u003E to $554 million last year with Sledgehammer Games\u2019 \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty: Advanced Warfare\u003C\/em\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EAccording to Activision \u003Cspan class=\u0022tickershortcode quotecard_hook unprocessed neutral\u0022 data-symbol=\u0022ATVI\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\u003Cspan class=\u0022wrapper trend-wrapper\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\u003Ca class=\u0022exit_trigger_set\u0022 href=\u0022http:\/\/fortune.com\/fortune500\/activision-blizzard-585\/\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cspan class=\u0022ticker\u0022\u003EATVI\u003C\/span\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\u003Cspan class=\u0022change percent\u0022\u003E\u003C\/span\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\t\u003C\/a\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\u003C\/span\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003C\/span\u003E, fans played more than 75 million hours of \u003Cem\u003EBlack Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E online. Activision Publishing CEO Eric Hirshberg said in a statement that people are playing\u003Cem\u003E Black Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E for more hours per player than any \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty\u003C\/em\u003E game on record.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EAnd yet Sartori Bernbeck, manager of the EEDAR Insights \u0026amp; Analytics team, says Treyarch has been adept at handling the huge number of users who flood into the game in the opening week.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cIn a market where other multiplayer-centric titles still struggle with having a smooth launch, \u003Cem\u003EBlack Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E is a great example to look at for proper execution,\u201d Bernbeck says.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EIn today\u2019s age where more consumers watch people play video games than actually play, \u003Cem\u003EBlack Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E established new marks in viewership as the No. 1 most streamed and most viewed game of any game launch in 2015, as reported by Amazon-owned livestreaming network Twitch.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cem\u003EBlack Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E introduces new features like an instant Live Event option that lets fans watch eSports competition from within the game. This will play a key role as Activision rolls out its new internal eSports tournament structure for 2016 and beyond with the expanded \u003Cem\u003ECall of Duty\u003C\/em\u003E World League that will award teams over $3 million in cash prizes next year.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EBernbeck says eSports will likely help better retain users year-round. More active users means more exposure across the gaming industry\u003Cstrong\u003E,\u003C\/strong\u003E which translates into more potential outreach to new audiences through livestreaming platforms like Twitch and shared YouTube videos.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EBernbeck believes the changes to online multiplayer gameplay that Treyarch has made could give Activision an advantage in strengthening its reach in the PC gaming market. That market is currently dominated by another first-person shooter, Valve\u0026#8217;s \u003Cem\u003ECounter-Strike: Global Offensive.\u003C\/em\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ETaylor says the eSports potential for \u003Cem\u003EBlack Ops 3\u003C\/em\u003E is significant, as there is already a huge fan base that may be interested in seeing how the pros play it.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cem\u003EFor more about video games, watch this Fortune video:\u003C\/em\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cdiv class=\u0022video-wrapper\u0022 data-ratio=\u00220.56363636363636\u0022 data-pos=\u00222\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\u003Cobject id=\u0022bc-video-4454832918001-2\u0022 class=\u0022BrightcoveExperience\u0022\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022bgcolor\u0022 value=\u0022#FFFFFF\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022width\u0022 value=\u0022550\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022height\u0022 value=\u0022310\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022playerID\u0022 value=\u00223160175193001\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022playerKey\u0022 value=\u0022AQ~~,AAAB668kGak~,LMlvL4u4ShOTHD9z00VquajMOcH97tcW\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022isVid\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022isUI\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022videoSmoothing\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022seamlessTabbing\u0022 value=\u0022false\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022swliveconnect\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022dynamicStreaming\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022autoStart\u0022 value=\u0022false\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022@videoPlayer\u0022 value=\u00224454832918001\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022linkBaseURL\u0022 value=\u0022http:\/\/for.tn\/1ROAJlM\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022includeAPI\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022templateLoadHandler\u0022 value=\u0022Fortune_onTemplateLoad\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022templateReadyHandler\u0022 value=\u0022Fortune_onTemplateReady\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022wmode\u0022 value=\u0022opaque\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022adServerURL\u0022 value=\u0022http:\/\/pubads.g.doubleclick.net\/gampad\/ads?env=vp\u0026#038;gdfp_req=1\u0026#038;impl=s\u0026#038;output=xml_vast2\u0026#038;iu=\/8484\/fort\/video_bc\/tech_bc\u0026#038;sz=1000x1\u0026#038;cust_params=tags%3Dentertainmentnews%2Chowdoigetubermadmax%2Ctechnews%2Cuber%2Cubercarservice%2Cuberdelorean%2Cuberkittens%2Cubermadmax%2Cuberpromos%2Cuberpuppiesondemand%2Cubertransformers%26ch%3Dtech%26topic%3Duber\u0026#038;unviewed_position_start=1\u0026#038;correlator=timestamp\u0022\/\u003E\u003C\/object\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003C\/div\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\tbrightcove.createExperiences();\n\t\t\t\u003C\/script\u003E\n","time":{"pretty":"November 11, 2015","published":"2015-11-11 04:45:48","updated":"2015-11-11 04:45:48","minute":"4:45 PM EST","is_same_day":true,"is_home_pop":true},"comment_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/call-of-duty-black-ops-3-sales\/","absolute_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/call-of-duty-black-ops-3-sales\/","redirect_url":"","partner":"","outbrain_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/call-of-duty-black-ops-3-sales\/","outbrain_footer":true,"outbrain_right_rail":true,"short_title":"\u2018Call Of Duty: Black Ops 3\u2019 Generates $550 Million In 72 Hours"},{"id":1422256,"content_type":"free full","is_magazine_content":"non-magazine","url":"\/2015\/11\/11\/presidential-candidates-debate-ceo-pay\/","title":"What the Presidential Candidates Are Failing to Address About CEO Pay","content":"\u003Cp class=\u0022p1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EIn Tuesday night\u2019s Republican TV debate, \u003Ci\u003EWall Street Journal \u003C\/i\u003Eeditor-in-chief, Gerald Baker, put the following question to presidential candidate Rand Paul: \u201cIncome inequality has been rising in the United States. Fifty years ago, for example, the average CEO of a big corporation in this country earned 20 times the average salary of one of his or her workers. Today, that CEO earns about 300 times the average salary of a worker. Does it matter at all that the gap between the rich and everyone else is widening?\u201d\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EPresidential hopeful Rand Paul accepted this but said that the cause lies with the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates low; therefore, offering no direct answer about the growing income equality, even while many CEOs pulled in a much higher pay ratio in 2014:\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cul\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThe CEO of Discovery Communications was paid $156 million or 1,951 times the median worker pay of $80,000.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThe CEO of Chipotle was paid $28.9 million or 1,522 times the median worker pay of $19,000.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThe CEO of CVS was paid $32.4 million or 1,192 times the median worker pay of $27,139.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThe CEO of Walmart was paid $25.6 million or 1,133 times the median worker pay of $22,591.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThe CEO of McDonald\u2019s was paid $7,29 million or 644 times the media worker pay of $11,324.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003C\/ul\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThese pay ratios are massive. Companies with these pay ratios will have to do a lot of explaining. Even if the average pay ratio of major Fortune 500 companies is 300-to-1, the question is: are our CEOs overpaid or our workers underpaid?\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThis is news because the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) just approved by a 3 to 2 vote along party lines that public companies will have to disclose these pay ratios. Five years earlier under the Dodd-Frank law, the S.E.C. was asked to come up with this measure. Now that it is official and beginning in 2017, public companies will be required to post these numbers.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003ENot surprisingly, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is expected to sue over this rule and get the courts to deny the SEC\u2019s right to require these numbers.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EMany companies had been resisting supplying this information, arguing that the two numbers are difficult and costly to estimate: (a) a CEO\u2019s pay includes salary, bonuses, stock options, restricted stock grants, and long-term incentive payouts, not to mention that a CEO\u2019s pay varies every year, and (b) the median workers\u2019 pay in a multinational corporation differs in different countries and the resulting median number is almost meaningless. \u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EProbably what is really on their mind is that it will create bad publicity for their company and for capitalism itself. It could make combatants out of their employees, consumers, investor groups and even state governments. \u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cul\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EEmployees may see competitive companies paying a higher median worker pay than they are receiving, and this can get them to start or join a union. \u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EUnions are in favor of pay transparency because it will help them bargain better for wage increases.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EConsumers may conclude that a company\u2019s prices are too high partly because of high executive pay and decide not to buy from companies that pay very high CEO pay ratios. \u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThe company\u2019s shareholders might be upset with the negative publicity and reconsider whether they are paying their CEO too much.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EInvestor groups may use pay transparency information in making decisions on which companies to invest in.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003ECEOs at other companies who are only paid 100 times the median worker pay may either complain that they are underpaid or join the chorus of consumers and charge that most CEOs are overpaid.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003C\/ul\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EYet high CEO paying companies will counter that they have scientifically determined the correct CEO pay offer. They want to attract the most competent CEO. His or her pay needs to be as high or higher than the pay of the competing CEOs in that industry. Companies should be free to pay whatever they need to get the most desirable CEO.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EMany Americans believe that the CEO pay process is not scientific but a rigged system where compensation consulting firms have an interest in recommending high pay levels because this increases their pay commission in pursuing a CEO candidate.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EThe problem of high CEO pay creates another problem. Senior vice presidents have to be paid at a level related to the CEO\u2019s pay. As a result, the total senior pay package in large corporations is top heavy in relation to the pay packages of competitors from other countries. So American companies have to charge higher prices for their export goods and services than foreign companies to cover the higher American pay packages. This dampens our export-winning rate and is a factor contributing to our high annual deficits on foreign trade.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003EWe need more debate on what is fair pay for senior managers and what is fair pay for ordinary workers. Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have been brave enough to highlight this question in this heated election period when it really matters. It\u2019s not a bad question to ask each political candidate where he or she stands.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p3\u0022\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\u0022video-wrapper\u0022 data-ratio=\u00220.56363636363636\u0022 data-pos=\u00223\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\t\u003Cobject id=\u0022bc-video-4606015938001-3\u0022 class=\u0022BrightcoveExperience\u0022\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022bgcolor\u0022 value=\u0022#FFFFFF\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022width\u0022 value=\u0022550\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022height\u0022 value=\u0022310\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022playerID\u0022 value=\u00223160175193001\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022playerKey\u0022 value=\u0022AQ~~,AAAB668kGak~,LMlvL4u4ShOTHD9z00VquajMOcH97tcW\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022isVid\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022isUI\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022videoSmoothing\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022seamlessTabbing\u0022 value=\u0022false\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022swliveconnect\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022dynamicStreaming\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022autoStart\u0022 value=\u0022false\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022@videoPlayer\u0022 value=\u00224606015938001\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022linkBaseURL\u0022 value=\u0022http:\/\/for.tn\/1HA7CCl\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022includeAPI\u0022 value=\u0022true\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022templateLoadHandler\u0022 value=\u0022Fortune_onTemplateLoad\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022templateReadyHandler\u0022 value=\u0022Fortune_onTemplateReady\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022wmode\u0022 value=\u0022opaque\u0022\/\u003E\u003Cparam name=\u0022adServerURL\u0022 value=\u0022http:\/\/pubads.g.doubleclick.net\/gampad\/ads?env=vp\u0026#038;gdfp_req=1\u0026#038;impl=s\u0026#038;output=xml_vast2\u0026#038;iu=\/8484\/fort\/video_bc\/leadership_bc\u0026#038;sz=1000x1\u0026#038;cust_params=tags%3Dbencarson%2Ccarlyfiorina%2Cchrischristie%2Cdonaldtrump%2Cgopdebate%2Cjebbush%2Cjohnkasich%2Cmarcorubio%2Cmikehuckabee%2Crandpaul%2Crepublicanpresidentialdebate%26ch%3Dleadership%26topic%3Dgopdebate\u0026#038;unviewed_position_start=1\u0026#038;correlator=timestamp\u0022\/\u003E\u003C\/object\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003C\/div\u003E\n\t\t\t\u003Cscript type=\u0022text\/javascript\u0022\u003E\n\t\t\t\tbrightcove.createExperiences();\n\t\t\t\u003C\/script\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp class=\u0022p1\u0022\u003E\u003Cem\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s1\u0022\u003E\u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/www.kellogg.northwestern.edu\/faculty\/directory\/kotler_philip.aspx\u0022 target=\u0022_blank\u0022\u003EPhilip Kotler\u003C\/a\u003E is a \u003C\/span\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022s2\u0022\u003Eprofessor at Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and author of 55 marketing books including Confronting Capitalism: Real Solutions for a Troubled Economic System.\u003C\/span\u003E\u003C\/em\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n","time":{"pretty":"November 11, 2015","published":"2015-11-11 04:20:27","updated":"2015-11-11 04:20:27","minute":"4:20 PM EST","is_same_day":true,"is_home_pop":true},"comment_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/presidential-candidates-debate-ceo-pay\/","absolute_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/presidential-candidates-debate-ceo-pay\/","redirect_url":"","partner":"","outbrain_url":"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/11\/11\/presidential-candidates-debate-ceo-pay\/","outbrain_footer":true,"outbrain_right_rail":true,"short_title":"Presidential Candidates Are Failing to Address CEO Pay"}]}