Legal but shocking.
Everyone is still reeling from President Trump’s abrupt decision to fire FBI director James Comey on Tuesday night. The reactions include Sen. Chuck Schumer calling for a special prosecutor, and many in the media likening the incident to an infamous political “massacre” that preceded the fall of the Nixon presidency.
But the significance of Trump’s decision turns on large part on whether Comey’s firing was legal. The optics of ousting the FBI Director amid a probe of Russia’s ties are terrible—as the Wall Street Journal acknowledged in an editorial supporting the decision. But that doesn’t mean Trump didn’t have the authority to do it.
To get a sense of how serious the Comey firing really is, Fortune surveyed the reaction of influential legal scholars who have the expertise to assess Trump’s action. Here’s what they’re saying:
‘A Profoundly Dangerous Thing’
In a widely-circulated blog post titled “The Nightmare Scenario: Trump Fires.. the One Man Who Would Stand Up to Him,” Benjamin Wittes and Susan Hennessey of Lawfare say Trump had the legal authority to fire Comey. But they call the decision “profoundly dangerous” and explain it amounts to an unprecedented disregard for the norms and traditions of the Justice Department and the FBI.
The post also looks at the memo in which the Justice Department makes the case for dismissing Comey. The scholars agree some of Comey’s actions might merit criticism, including the political nature of his press conferences. But they also say the memo reads like a “bad op-ed” and that “Trump’s clumsy attempt to deny that his own conduct is at issue in the FBI’s inquiry is foolish.”
‘Trump’s Actions Were Entirely Constitutional’
Josh Blackman, a conservative and noted constitutional law professor at the South Texas College of Law, explains on his blog that there is no question Trump had the authority to fire Comey. He notes that, under the Constitution, the President has absolute power to fire “principal officers” like the FBI Director, and notes the firing was accompanied by “fairly elaborate reasons” from the Deputy Attorney General.
Blackman also addresses the issue of whether Trump has plunged the country into a constitutional crisis:
He also suggests the comparisons to Nixon’s “Saturday Night Massacre” are not apt because the circumstances are different and because what Nixon did was obviously illegal.
‘We Need a Special Prosecutor—Badly’
On the popular legal blog called the Volokh Conspiracy, law professor David Post expresses bafflement about the Trump Administration’s reasons for firing Comey at this moment in time. Post notes the abrupt shifts in Trump’s regard for Comey (the President was hailing his performance just weeks ago) and says he would have supported Trump’s decision to fire Comey—if he had made the decision in January. Now, he says, everything looks suspicious:
Post adds that the Justice Department’s stated reasons for firing Comey sound like a pretext, and that they do not sound the real reasons for why he was fired.
‘Trump Has Crossed the Line’
Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe is an outspoken liberal and critic of Trump, so it’s not surprising he opposes the President’s decision to fire Comey. But Tribe is also a noted constitutional scholar, so his words carry weight.
On Twitter, Tribe argued it’s time for the House of Representatives to commence impeachment proceedings. Here are some of his notable tweets:
The Bottom Line
The emerging consensus among legal scholars is that President Trump had the legal authority to fire Comey. But in doing so, he’s set about the biggest political crisis of his young presidency and, for now, it’s too soon to say if this crisis will pass.