The Washington Post reports that Issa, the California Republican who will become chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee tomorrow, plans to “lead six major investigations in the first three months of the year.”
His intended topics include Wikileaks, recalls at the Food and Drug Administration and the role of the always popular Fannie Mae FNMA and Freddie Mac Fmcc in the foreclosure crisis. Plenty of things worth looking at in each case, so no argument there.
That seems like an odd choice, because unlike the three earlier topics the FCIC’s alleged failure isn’t likely to have a tangible effect on anything. No diplomats are going to be threatened or children poisoned as a result of the FCIC writing what is widely expected to be an unsatisfactory report.
Not that anyone is in doubt about the outcome. The Republicans on the committee released an apologia for Wall Street last month, indicating all is not peace and harmony within the congressionally appointed group, which by all accounts will fall somewhat short of replicating the authoritative Pecora Commission of the 1930s.
But that was not exactly a surprise to anyone who watched any of the FCIC hearings and saw various commissioners doggedly pursuing their own agendas regardless of the connection or lack of same to the topic at hand. And is Darrell Issa, the guy who brought you all the noise about the friends of Angelo and later sought to probe the FCIC’s lavish $8 million budget, really the one to iron all this out in the name of truth and justice?
Some people hope so, but I’m hesitant to jump on that bandwagon.
“Too often, a problem is allowed to fester until it reaches a crisis point,” Issa told the Washington Post, “and the American people are left asking the question: what went wrong and why?” Somehow I don’t think an Issa investigation of the FCIC is the answer to those questions.